Paul:
All right, Sue, do you want to work with me on this presentation we need to give next week?
Sue:
So we've got to talk about one artist and show up to six of their artworks.
Paul:
We could talk about John Sell Cotman.
Sue:
The English watercolor painter from the 1800s.
Paul:
You can tell a Cotman painting as soon as you see one.
Sue:
I mean, he painted landscapes and architecture just like his contemporaries, but Cotman had this unique way of applying color.
Paul:
Yes, he'd put on one layer of paint, let it dry, then do another layer on top of that to make the color more intense.
Paul:
So regardless of whether he signed the picture, you immediately know it's a Cotman.
Sue:
Thing is, when we present to the other students, well, Cotman, he's not exactly Van Gogh, is he?
Sue:
As in, he's not a world-famous painter who had a huge influence.
Paul:
You and I were both familiar with him, but not everybody will be.
Paul:
So we can't assume any prior knowledge.
Sue:
I read that he often stayed somewhere called Bransby, but I'm not aware he ever painted Bransby, so I'm not sure why he went.
Paul:
Oh, he stayed with friends who owned a house there when he was on painting tours, and they introduced him to wealthy people who would offer him work, maybe to paint their portrait or whatever.
Sue:
So he was on the lookout for his next commission.
Paul:
It was in his interest to keep getting invited back.
Paul:
Shall we focus on Cotman's friendships in our talk, his love life and family?
Sue:
Make our classmates feel they're getting to know Cotman, the man.
Paul:
Well, we could in theory go through some of the letters he wrote.
Paul:
I mean, plenty of them have survived, but to be honest, that might be off-topic.
Paul:
And it would take ages.
Paul:
I say we keep to the brief and limit ourselves to his artworks.
Paul:
Make sure our audience knows what makes his paintings so fascinating.
Paul:
Okay, so our presentation can show six Cotman paintings.
Sue:
Yeah, and we can research more and decide what to say about each one we choose.
Paul:
One good example is his painting of that tall stone bridge, Chirk Aqueduct.
Paul:
At least that's what it's called.
Paul:
Thing is though, the actual aqueduct at Chirk doesn't look anything like it.
Sue:
The proportions are totally different.
Paul:
So maybe it's actually somewhere else entirely.
Sue:
Maybe Cotman got it wrong when he was naming the picture.
Sue:
And then there's Inrokerby Park.
Paul:
It's atmospheric, but doesn't have much detail.
Sue:
Was it left unfinished, do you think?
Paul:
If we compare it to some of his other landscapes, we might be able to tell.
Paul:
And then there's his painting of Bedlam Furnace.
Paul:
It shows the way that many English towns in the early 1800s were industrializing, completely transforming the urban landscape.
Sue:
Yeah, factory chimneys spewing out dark smoke.
Sue:
Total contrast to all those rural scenes he painted.
Paul:
Is that his only portrayal of heavy industry?
Sue:
I'm not aware of any more.
Paul:
We can do a quick search, see if there are.
Sue:
Oh, another one to show is Croyland Abbey.
Paul:
Oh, that's the one where, when he was on site, making a sketch of the building.
Paul:
I think there was some incident.
Sue:
Didn't he get involved in a fight with a passerby?
Sue:
I only have a vague memory of reading about it.
Sue:
I'll have to look it up.
Paul:
Yeah, and let me know.
Paul:
And we could show the kitchen.
Sue:
It's an interior view, quite unusual for Cotman.
Sue:
That features a couple of seated figures by the kitchen table.
Paul:
I wonder if they're Cotman's family.
Paul:
I've got a book on Cotman.
Paul:
I'll see if that says anything about their possible identity.
Paul:
Another interesting picture is Doorway at Riveau.
Paul:
Supposedly painted in 1803, when Cotman was just 21.
Sue:
But the thing is, it looks more like his mature style.
Sue:
So I wonder if it was actually done later.
Sue:
Yeah, and his style had evolved.
Paul:
Not sure if we'll find any evidence about that, but we can try.